
Semi-automatic paste fillers
Flexible piston filling for smaller batches, trials, contract packing and products where an operator places containers or controls each cycle.
View semi-auto route →Shortlist semi-automatic paste fillers, automatic piston filling machines, viscous liquid fillers and integrated paste filling lines around your product, container and output target.

Compare manual handling, semi-automatic filling, automatic multi-head filling and full line integration before choosing a machine route.

Flexible piston filling for smaller batches, trials, contract packing and products where an operator places containers or controls each cycle.
View semi-auto route →
Inline multi-nozzle filling for higher output, repeatable dosing and integration with conveyors, capping, labelling and coding.
View automatic route →
Positive-displacement volumetric dosing for sauces, creams, gels, honey, sealants and similar viscous products.
Compare piston fillers →
Plan the filler with closure handling, bottle stability, conveyor layout, labelling and end-of-line requirements from the start.
Plan line integration →| Route | Best fit | Typical decision points | More detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-automatic piston paste filler | Small to medium batches, trials and flexible production. | Operator handling, hopper capacity, dose module, foot-pedal or timed cycle, compressed air supply. | Semi-auto fillers |
| Automatic paste filling machine | Higher output bottle, jar or tub filling with conveyors. | Nozzle count, fill volume range, anti-drip cut-off, HMI recipes, changeovers and downstream equipment. | Automatic fillers |
| Piston paste filling | Repeatable volumetric filling of thick but pumpable products. | Viscosity, particulate size, cylinder range, cleaning access and product contact materials. | Piston fillers |
| Viscous liquid filling system | Products between liquid and paste, including lotions, shampoos, gels and detergents. | Pump style, foaming, stringing, container opening and whether a paste or liquid route is more suitable. | Viscous filling |
| Integrated paste filling line | Manufacturers needing filling, capping, labelling and conveying to run together. | Line speed, bottle stability, closure type, cap feeding, labelling position, coding and accumulation. | Line integration |
The same machine may perform differently with a cold gel, warm sauce, sticky honey or stringy adhesive. Use these checks to send the details needed for a more accurate machine recommendation.

Ketchup, chutney, pesto, mayonnaise, dressings and viscous food sauces where drip control and clean jar presentation matter.
Sauce filling machines →
Thick, sticky and temperature-sensitive products that may need heated hoppers, careful cut-off and reliable fill repeatability.
Honey and jam fillers →
Creams, masks, lotions, gels and personal-care products where cleanability, recipe control and closure integration are important.
Cream and gel filling →
Industrial pastes, waxes, greases, adhesives and sealants where viscosity, stringing and material compatibility must be reviewed.
Industrial paste filling →Paste fillers are specified for products that do not flow like water-thin liquids. The equipment, hopper feed, pump or piston route, nozzle style and cut-off arrangement must suit the viscosity and container.
Often yes, but it depends on viscosity range, fill volume range, cleaning time, product contact parts, hopper design, nozzle size and changeover frequency.
Provide product details, fill volume, container dimensions, closure, target output, cleaning needs, available air or power, and whether capping or labelling must be integrated.
Lancing publishes several piston and pump-based configurations across its specialist machinery sites. They are useful reference points, but the final fill range, accuracy and output must be confirmed against the actual product, container and production conditions.
| Published Lancing reference | Verified configuration detail | How to use the figure |
|---|---|---|
| Automatic paste filler | Six filling nozzles; piston modules listed as 5–100, 10–300, 50–500, 100–1000, 500–3000 and 1000–5000 ml; reference accuracy listed as ≤±1%. | Use only as a starting configuration. Accuracy must be checked at the required dose with the real product, product temperature and container. |
| Semi-automatic paste filler | Pneumatic twin-head piston format with cylinder modules listed from 10–100 ml through to 1000–5000 ml. | Confirm the chosen cylinder covers every required SKU without forcing one module to work at an unsuitable extreme. |
| Rotor-lobe filling route | Published 5–5000 ml range, multi-nozzle options, stainless construction and options for heated or jacketed product paths. | Confirm particle passage, shear, cleaning method and dose control by trial. Pump range does not by itself define achievable output. |
An accuracy percentage is incomplete unless the test states the product, dose, density or weight conversion, product temperature, number of samples, machine speed, container and measurement method. For regulated net contents, agree the buyer’s own quality and legal-metrology requirements rather than relying on a generic catalogue statement.
Output depends on product refill time, piston or pump stroke, nozzle opening, container indexing, head count and downstream capacity. A meaningful result is a timed run that includes stable product supply and repeated containers, not a single fastest cycle.
Record the largest particle, typical particle concentration and whether pieces must remain intact. Valve ports, pipework, pump clearances and nozzle bore should all be reviewed. A product may be pumpable yet still block or damage at the final nozzle.
List every wetted part from hopper or feed pump to the nozzle. Decide what can be cleaned in place, what must be removed, how residual product is recovered and how the machine will be verified clean before the next batch.
Use the product sample, dose range and pack geometry to narrow the route before comparing price. This reduces the risk of buying a machine with the right headline range but the wrong valve, nozzle or cleaning arrangement.
Record temperature, viscosity behaviour, particles, aeration, settling and any sensitivity to shear or pressure.
Review viscous-product behaviour →Compare piston, rotor-lobe and other positive-displacement methods against the real product path and changeover needs.
Compare dosing technologies →Agree sample count, fill measurement, clean cut-off, output and cleaning demonstrations before the equipment is signed off.
Plan the test protocol →No. Published ranges normally use different cylinder or dosing modules. The selected module should be matched to the actual minimum and maximum fills and confirmed during a representative trial.
The dosing principle may be similar, but wetted materials, seals, cleaning, hygiene, curing risk and product recovery can be very different. Compatibility and changeover must be reviewed for each product family.
The test method should match the buyer’s quality requirement. Weight checks are often practical, but density and temperature must be considered when a volumetric dose is being assessed by mass.
Enough product is needed to prime the hopper, pump, hoses and nozzles, adjust settings and run repeated fills. The exact quantity depends on the machine path and should be agreed before the test.
Include them at the start when container stability, product on the neck, cap presentation or label application could limit the line. A filler should not be specified in isolation if downstream handling sets the true production rate.