
Sauces and condiments
Ketchup, chutney, pesto, mayonnaise, dressings and viscous food sauces where drip control and clean jar presentation matter.
Sauce filling machines →Explain the most common paste filling method in plain production language: product movement, cylinder range, hopper feed, nozzle cut-off and cleanability.

Thicker products often need a controlled volumetric dosing method. Compare piston filling when you need repeatable fills for sauces, creams, gels, honey, pastes or similar viscous products.
A proper specification should cover fill range, cylinder selection, hopper feed, valve and nozzle design, cleaning access, product temperature and changeover. Avoid over-promising: the right answer depends on product testing and sample review.
| Question | Why it matters | What to send |
|---|---|---|
| What is the product? | Viscosity, particles and temperature affect the cylinder, valve and nozzle. | Product name, sample, SDS for chemicals and expected filling temperature. |
| What is the dose? | The cylinder range must match smallest and largest required fill. | Minimum and maximum fill volume plus tolerance target. |
| What container is used? | Neck opening and stability decide nozzle diameter and handling method. | Photos, dimensions, material and container samples. |
| How often do you change SKU? | Changeovers affect cleaning, hopper design and operator workload. | SKU list, cleaning needs and batch size. |

Ketchup, chutney, pesto, mayonnaise, dressings and viscous food sauces where drip control and clean jar presentation matter.
Sauce filling machines →
Thick, sticky and temperature-sensitive products that may need heated hoppers, careful cut-off and reliable fill repeatability.
Honey and jam fillers →
Creams, masks, lotions, gels and personal-care products where cleanability, recipe control and closure integration are important.
Cream and gel filling →
Industrial pastes, waxes, greases, adhesives and sealants where viscosity, stringing and material compatibility must be reviewed.
Industrial paste filling →A piston filler moves a defined volume of product using a positive-displacement action, which makes it useful for many viscous and paste-like products.
They may be suitable for some particulate products, but particle size, suspension, valve design and product path need review before selection.
Fill range, product temperature, air pockets, viscosity, cylinder size, valve design, nozzle cut-off and operator setup can all affect repeatability.
A piston filler draws product into a measured chamber and discharges it into the pack. Repeatable displacement is only useful when the product enters the cylinder consistently, passes the valves without damage or blockage and leaves the nozzle with a controlled cut-off.
Choose the cylinder module around the production dose range. The published Lancing piston ranges use several modules rather than one universal cylinder. Confirm the working stroke for each SKU and how calibration will be checked after a product or cylinder change.
Valve port size and geometry affect how thick or particulate product moves into and out of the cylinder. The largest particle, its shape and concentration should be compared with the narrowest restriction. A product sample trial should check for damage, bridging and inconsistent chamber fill.
Product chemistry, temperature, cleaning agents and abrasive inclusions can affect piston seals, valve seats and hoses. For adhesives or reactive products, define maximum dwell time and shutdown cleaning before specifying materials.
A closing nozzle can stop flow at the tip, while suck-back can draw a small amount of product away from the outlet. The correct arrangement depends on stringing, product elasticity, pressure and neck opening. Too much suck-back can pull air into the path or disturb dose repeatability.
| Failure mode | Likely areas to investigate | Evidence to collect |
|---|---|---|
| Fill quantity drifts | Air in the cylinder, inconsistent hopper feed, seal leakage, product temperature or incomplete valve switching. | Sequential fill checks, product temperature, hopper level and observation of the inlet stroke. |
| Short or intermittent fills | Restricted inlet, particles at a valve, product cavitation or insufficient refill time. | Product sample, particle data, refill timing and inspection of the product path. |
| Drips or strings | Nozzle type, suck-back setting, product pressure, fill profile and product temperature. | Close-up video, time between containers and neck-opening dimensions. |
| Slow cleaning | Excess hold-up, inaccessible valves, unsuitable hose layout or too many product-contact parts. | Strip-down demonstration, residual product quantity and written cleaning sequence. |
For general volumetric principles, see Lancing piston filling machines. Keep this paste-focused route for products where thick flow, hopper feed, particles and nozzle cut-off are central to the design.
Strong candidate for repeatable batch doses when valves and cylinder can handle the product.
Consider rotor-lobe or another positive-displacement pump when continuous product transfer or a different product path is preferable.
Compare positive displacement →Confirm chamber refill, particle passage, dose repeatability and cleaning with representative product.
Plan a product test →The cylinder sets the available displacement range. The selected module should cover the required fills with enough adjustment and repeatability, without relying on one cylinder to operate impractically across every size.
Some can, provided the complete passage is large enough and the valve action does not crush or trap the inclusions. Test the largest credible particles and their normal concentration.
Air can enter through an aerated product, low hopper level, poor inlet feed, excessive suck-back or leakage. Air changes apparent volume and can reduce repeatability.
No. It is one cut-off tool. The nozzle, product pressure, fill profile and product behaviour should be tested together, because excessive suck-back can create other problems.
State the product, temperature, dose, sample count, speed and measurement method. A percentage without those conditions is not enough for acceptance.
A pump route may be preferable when product transfer, particles, continuous feed, shear or cleaning requirements do not suit the selected piston valves and cylinder.