Choose the automation level
Compare operator work, batch flexibility and integration.
Read the guide →One paste filler can sometimes cover several products and packs, but only when the dosing path, fill range, change parts, cleaning method and acceptance tests are compatible. Products should be grouped by engineering behaviour rather than by brand or market category.

The safest route is to create product-and-pack families. A family shares a credible product path, dose module, nozzle range, contact-material requirement, cleaning method and container-handling approach. The hardest normal member is then trialled at the lowest and highest planned fill conditions.
| Common feature | What may remain shared | What still needs proof |
|---|---|---|
| Similar product behaviour | Feed route, chamber or pump and broad nozzle type. | Temperature, particles, aeration, stringing and refill at production speed. |
| Similar dose range | Cylinder or pump configuration and controls. | Repeatability at both range limits and practical adjustment resolution. |
| Similar pack opening | Nozzle family and fill position. | Alignment, headspace, clean cut-off and container stability. |
| Compatible cleaning route | Wetted parts and changeover sequence. | Residue, cross-contact, recovery and restart acceptance. |
Two products can share a dosing path when every wetted restriction, seal, hose, valve and nozzle can pass both products, remain compatible with them and be cleaned to the required standard. Similar appearance or viscosity alone is not enough.
Compare the hardest refill condition, largest normal inclusion, stringing, air sensitivity, temperature and shutdown behaviour. Where one product cures, stains, carries allergens or needs a different cleaning chemistry, a dedicated wetted set or separate route may be justified.
Not necessarily. A module that reaches the highest volume may provide poor resolution or an impractical short stroke at the lowest volume, while a small module may require multiple doses or excessive cycle time at the top end.
Test the smallest and largest required fills with the actual product. Record adjustment method, repeatability, refill time and any change parts. The result should show a practical operating window, not only a theoretical capacity.
Nozzles, seals, hoses, product-contact valves, cylinder or pump modules, container guides, stops, height settings and sensor positions are common change points. The exact list depends on product behaviour and pack geometry.
Create a changeover sheet that identifies parts, settings, tools, cleaning status and a first-off approval check. A machine is flexible only when the change can be completed and verified within the production window.
Map every surface that holds product, then define what residue is unacceptable before the next SKU. The cleaning method must address hidden volumes, seals, dead legs, hoses, valves and nozzles as well as the visible hopper.
Use the product owner’s hygiene, allergen, chemical-compatibility or quality requirements. Prove recovery, strip-down, cleaning, inspection and restart with the hardest changeover rather than assuming a rinse is sufficient.
Test the boundary product and pack combinations, the most difficult cleaning transition and the longest realistic stop. Record fill results, appearance, cut-off, changeover time, retained product and the first accepted packs after restart.
The sample trial guide and cleaning guide help turn flexibility into witnessed acceptance points.
Use the related pages to connect this answer to product trials, machine selection and a quotation-ready application.
Compare operator work, batch flexibility and integration.
Read the guide →Compare direct hopper loading with transfer-pump feeding.
Read the guide →Record dose, product, pack, cleaning and acceptance conditions.
Read the guide →Send the SKU list, fill ranges, product conditions, packs and required cleaning transitions. Lancing can identify which combinations need separate trials or change parts.